- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:29:58 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:58:29 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm actually not sure where that ordering came from. I may have simply > made it up, as it doesn't appear in MQ3. > > You're right that it doesn't affect any existing MQs, as they all have > discrete values; any-pointer/hover are the first MQs to feature > multiple values being true at once. I'm fine with changing it to be > simpler. We can simplify your text further: > > "If it would be true for any values other than the number 0, a > dimension with the value 0, or the keyword 'none', the media features > evaluates to true. Otherwise, it evaluates to false." I introduced the ordering, and Tab introduced the MQs with non-discrete values, and it looks like we did not consider the implications of each other's edits. Now that we do have non-discrete values, I agree that the new phrasing/behavior makes a lot more sense. - Florian Rivoal
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 16:30:27 UTC