- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:23:52 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 08/07/2014 04:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Rather, I think it should be expanded to "a flex-basis of 'main-size', >> or an indefinite flex-basis". Right? There are more values than just >> "auto" that are indefinite. > > Hmm, good point. > > Though, we already *know* that we have an indefinite flex basis, given > that we're evaluating this part of the algorithm. (If we had a definite > flex basis, we'd have gotten to (A) and stopped ("If the item has a > definite flex basis, that’s the flex base size.")) > > So maybe the second bullet-point about "a flex basis of 'main-size'" > should just be removed? I *think* we actually intend it to only happen when the main size is actually "auto"; this is standard behavior for handling things with aspect ratios. (Note for readers at home, the quoted text actually means to say "a used flex basis of 'auto'"; the typo was caught in a different thread.) ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 01:24:39 UTC