Re: [css3-fonts] 'font-variant' shorthand missing sub and supert values (for font-variant-position)

David Baron wrote:

> The grammar for the 'font-variant' shorthand at:
> appears to be missing the 'sub' and 'super' values for the
> 'font-variant-position' subproperty defined at
> .

Yup, right you are. I'll fix that when I do some editing next week.


Received on Friday, 15 August 2014 08:16:35 UTC