- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:44:28 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 08/13/2014 05:42 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2014-08-13 12:43 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> We finished up the DoC for Counter Styles: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/issues-lc-20130718 >> >> There were a number of substantive changes since the last LCWD; >> they've been summarized in the Changes section: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#changes> >> >> It's now ready to publish as a fresh LCWD. We plan to publish next >> Thursday (Aug 21). We encourage people to review the changes and >> comment before then. > > I'd somewhat like to see this spec go to CR. We in fact resolved > for the spec to go to CR back in January [1], but it was never > published as a CR because Xidorn started raising issues resulting > from implementing it before the CR actually got published. > > We're currently planning to ship the implementation in Firefox 33 > (expected to ship October 14). I can justify shipping the feature > without an official CR based on the fact that the group resolved to > take the spec to CR and the only reason it didn't go to CR was the > implementor implementing in Gecko raising issues. However, it would > be nice to have an actual CR and not to have to do that. > > Could this publication be a CR rather than an LC? > > (According to [2], the new process doesn't really help since any > current LC proceeds next to CR under the old process, and from there > can proceed to CR under the new process.) I think there were sufficient substantive changes that we do need to publish as LC. (There were quite a few significant changes.) But we can take a short (3-week) comment period and hopefully have this published into CR before the end of September. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2014 01:45:08 UTC