- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:30:08 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 07/30/2014 11:10 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: > On 7/30/14, 2:49 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why would 2.px be bad? > > Looks like an error to me, but if that’s just me I’m fine with this. I > suppose we’d be making work for libraries that parse CSS strings. > > It just seems to me like an affordance that should be implemented at the > tool level rather than extending the grammar. Fwiw, I agree with Alan. Also, we shouldn't be changing CSS parsing rules lightly. This isn't a strong enough reason to make a change, imho. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 10:30:36 UTC