The spec[1] says the following for implied minimum size of flex items for the keyword of 'auto': On a flex item whose overflow is _not_ visible... This should probably read: On a flex item whose overflow _is_ visible In its current state this would result in any flex-item that is set to overflow: visible to have its min-width/min-height set to 0 This seems to be the opposite of what Elliot was wanting[2]: # instead I think we should combine the behavior so the min-width is min-content unless your overflow # property computes to a value other than visible in which case it should be 0. The explanation to Elliot for resolving on this seems[3] to imply that the spec is aligning with IEs implementation so this seems to be a typo. Sorry we didn't catch this earlier. Thanks, Greg [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#min-size-auto [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0538.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0463.htmlReceived on Friday, 25 April 2014 23:58:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC