- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:48:58 -0700
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote: > But it is then also necessary to decide on the behavior of -Inf and > NaN as the final result. -Inf logically becomes the most negative > allowed value (which in many cases will be 0), but I'm going to > suggest that NaN be treated as *positive* infinity to raise the odds > that someone will notice the math error. Treating NaN as +Inf was my thought as well. >> * We'll allow unit powers other than 1/0/-1. > > So, calc(1px * 2px / 3px) is valid then? That's probably most > convenient for authors. Yup. > Also, given what Matt Rakow said earlier today, I think the inverse > length stuff should be dropped. Yeah, makes sense. The <time>/<frequency> stuff should be kept, though. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 00:49:46 UTC