- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:10:01 +0000
- To: Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 25, 2014, at 9:07, Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:30:00AM +1100, I wrote: > >> I would thus be careful about specifying that this bar should always have >> visible gaps when letter-spacing is non-zero. > > More practically in terms of how to word the spec when addressing this issue > (if indeed we don't wish to specify that this bar should always have visible > gaps): the spec might merely say where letter-spacing is applied (namely at > syllable boundaries), without necessarily even mentioning the bar. If gaps in > the bar are mentioned, then the requirement might be on where gaps should/must > not appear. Hm, I agree to leave things that we’re not certain undefined. Is the “syllable boundaries” different from the current grapheme cluster definitions? If no, I suppose there’s no need to update the spec. If different, is it possible to change Unicode grapheme cluster, or is it something that letter-spacing point needs to be different from grapheme cluster boundaries? /koji
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 08:10:40 UTC