On Friday 2014-02-28 12:45 -0800, fantasai wrote: > On 02/03/2014 06:20 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > > >I know it's currently at-risk, but I don't feel like that section of > >the spec will be CR-ready before Chrome and IE are ready to ship > >implementations of the rest of the spec publicly. We should go ahead > >and punt it now, rather than pretending that it'll stay through to CR > >or delaying the CR of the spec due to this. > > That would be equivalent to shipping Regions with only element-based > region containers. The reason many people in the WG are against that > is because it encourages bad markup design. Shipping grid without > subgrid also encourages bad markup design. Worse, in fact, because it > requires *stripping* markup that otherwise would be there, not just > adding in a few extraneous empty elements. Does 'display-box: contents' [1] help at all to alleviate this concern? In other words, could authors use 'display-box: contents' to avoid having to eliminate markup in the same way that subgrids allow them to avoid eliminating markup? (If so, how would using display-box: contents compare to using subgrids?) -David [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-display/#the-display-box -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 06:40:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC