I cannot find issues for CSS WG to work on in this description. Is this mistakenly routed? /koji On Jan 25, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote: > State: > OPEN WG Comment > Product: > CSS3-text > Raised by: > Addison Phillips > Opened on: > 2014-01-23 > Description: > http://www.w3.org/2013/12/05-i18n-minutes.html > > Section 7.3. The I18N WG is aware that there is not a complete description of how kashida should be implemented--no "Arabic LREQ" similar to the "JLREQ" document--and that this makes interoperable styling that includes kashida difficult for implementers to contemplate and difficult for CSS to describe. > > See also: discussion on http://www.w3.org/2013/12/05-i18n-minutes.html#item05 > > Addison Phillips > Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126) > Chair (W3C I18N WG) > > Internationalization is not a feature. > It is an architecture.Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 18:53:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC