- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:09:02 +0000
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Hm, the text looks bad, but it’s a little hard to re-write as we already say: | CSS does not fully define where soft wrap opportunities occur, | however some controls are provided to distinguish common variations. I tried this text: | Soft wrap opportunities are as defined above. which links to where we refer to UAX14. Does this look ok? /koji On Jan 25, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote: > State: > OPEN WG Comment > Product: > CSS3-text > Raised by: > Richard Ishida > Opened on: > 2013-12-11 > Description: > 5.3. Breaking Rules for Letters: the ‘word-break’ property > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-text-3-20131010/#word-break-property > > "Words break according to their usual rules. " > > > If I understand correctly, it's not *words* that are breaking according to usual rules, but *text*. > > It may be worth clarifying that the 'usual rules' means basically according to UAX14 and the behaviour is therefore script dependent.
Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 17:09:36 UTC