- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 08:40:48 +0000
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> > 5. In "5.2. Breaking Rules for Punctuation", in this sentence > > and the one below it that is similar: > > "If the content language is Chinese or Japanese, then additionally > > allow (but otherwise forbid) for ‘normal’ and ‘loose’:" > > It's not clear to me what the 'otherwise' applies to - is it the > > 'normal' and 'loose', so it is forbidden in strict when the language > > is Chinese or Japanese? Or does it apply to the language as well, > > so it is forbidden in strict for Chinese and Japanese, and for any > > value for all other languages? If the latter, then the implication > > is that in eg English, breaks before U+2010 are forbidden. However, > > the later clarifying note seems to indicate that non-CJK text is > > only affected when the language is Chinese or Japanese. > > It applies to "is Chinese or Japanese", so it would be > If the content language is Chinese or Japanese then allow [...] > If the content language is not Chinese or Japanese then forbid [...] Re-worded to make the original intention clearer, though, this definition seems to have other issues[1] if the “otherwise" applies to “is Chinese or Japanese.” I’ll continue the discussion in the thread. [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/3EE56732-602B-4304-9817-E18A1F6EBCE8@gluesoft.co.jp /koji
Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 08:41:21 UTC