On 04/17/2014 02:34 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > am I correct in thinking that > the old algorithm could be tweaked to match the new algorithm simply by > making some simple modifications to old-step-5 ("Distribute free space > proportional to the flex factors")[1]? The following modifications in > particular: > - If we're using flex-grow, and the sum of flex-grow factors is < 1, > then use the flex-grow factor directly. > - If we're using flex-shrink, and the sum of flex-shrink factors is < > 1, then renormalize the scaled flex shrink factors so that their total > is equal to the sum of [unscaled] flex-shrink factors, and use these > renormalized values directly. Actually, I think I've come up with an even simpler tweak to the old algorithm that achieves the same thing as the new algorithm, but I'll suggest it in a new thread.Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 21:46:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC