- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:06:02 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/06/2013 12:07 PM, Simon Sapin wrote: > Hi, > > What is the preferred method for tracking issues for this spec? > If find some inline, some on www-style, some on wiki.csswg.org, > some in W3C’s Bugzilla… I fear that some issues are just sitting > in a corner, forgotten. Some will get tossed inline, if Tab and I think it needs to be called out to people reviewing the spec, but the main tracking is on www-style. (I've marked the wiki as obsolete; it was used for discussion around open design questions. And we're not using Bugzilla. I've closed off those issues, except for two, which need review.) My current (as of yesterday) tracking system is to scan through all emails with 'grid' in the subject up to the previous WD announcement, deal with them, and tag them "done" if there's a reply with the fix (or answer to the question) and nothing left for the editors to do. This seems to work well. So far I have two open issues: - restrictions on <custom-ident> applicable to grid line/area names - orthogonal flows At some point when it stabilizes, we'll switch to DoC-based tracking, which still collects on www-style. I'll probably still use my "done" tag to make sure we caught all the issues. :) But then it'll be easier to see what's filed and what's open. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 17:06:29 UTC