On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Justin Novosad <junov@google.com> wrote: > > Not sure I understand Tab's suggestion of having it both in markup and > CSS. > > I'm not suggesting that, though I see how my comment could be read > that way. I'm fine with it in CSS, in HTML, or in both. Any of the > possibilities are fine with me. > > > Does one override the other? Could canvas.drawImage only depend on the > HTML > > attribute and not on CSS (to avoid depending on style computation?) > > If we had both, I'd probably design it so that the HTML feature won > (the CSS one would supply a "default" orientation, which could be > explicitly overridden by the document language). Then canvas and > similar things could look at just HTML when something was explicitly > specified. > Doing that would offer a solution to the canvas/WebGL problem without foregoing the convenience of CSS. But I worry it would be too confusing. Past experience: canvas width/height in CSS vs. markup http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2588181/canvas-is-stretched-when-using-css-but-normal-with-width-height-properties > ~TJ >
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 18:50:05 UTC