W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2014

Re: [css-color] Feedback on the image-orientation CSS property

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:45:32 -0700
To: Justin Novosad <junov@google.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20140416194532.GA2662@crum.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2014-04-16 12:21 -0700, Justin Novosad wrote:
> Hi,
> In this discussion thread, concerns were raised regarding whether
> image-orientation should be a CSS property:
> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2014-April/254148.html
> tl;dr:
>    - Property should be move to markup: it is more semantic than stylistic.
>    Image orientation affects the content.
>    - It would be desirable to take image orientation into account when
>    drawing an image to 2D canvas or WebGL. If orientation is expressed by a
>    CSS property, that would imply making canvas draws dependent on style
>    computation.

It seems reasonable to me to have an attribute that says that the
EXIF orientation should be honored be part of the content.  I don't
know if the rest of what's in image-orientation is needed (either in
markup or in CSS); I'd be happy to drop it from Gecko with such a
replacement, assuming that it's not going to lead to a huge amount
of churn (since image-orientation is already something we're
shipping and depend on internally, and I'd rather not have to redo
it multiple times).


𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 19:46:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:41 UTC