- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:29:32 -0700
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > In the current draft, symbols() function accepts 'numeric' and 'alphabetic' > as type, but the requirement of minimum number of symbols is not mentioned. > > I suggest that a note should be added to symbols() section to clarify the > behavior when number of symbols provided is not sufficient. Good catch, I've made the symbols() function invalid in that case. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 14 April 2014 22:30:19 UTC