On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In addition, since animation-name accepts none for a different meaning, > 'none' should be excluded from acceptable value for setter as well. > > > I don't understand what this means; why would we want to prevent a valid > animation-name property value from being set? I mean, 'none' should not be a valid value for CSSKeyframesRule.name, since it will never be used by animation-name. - XidornReceived on Thursday, 10 April 2014 23:12:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC