W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2014

Re: Can we have more maths in calc()?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 17:35:50 -0400
Message-ID: <5341C8B6.9070805@mit.edu>
To: www-style@w3.org

On 4/6/14 3:55 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> The possibility of functions implemented in JavaScript seems not
> unreasonable, too

It's unreasonable unless you define exactly when those execute, because 
they can have side effects.

-Boris

Received on Sunday, 6 April 2014 21:36:20 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Zack Weinberg: "Re: Can we have more maths in calc()?"
Previous message: Liam R E Quin: "Re: Can we have more maths in calc()?"
In reply to: Liam R E Quin: "Re: Can we have more maths in calc()?"
Next in thread: Liam R E Quin: "Re: Can we have more maths in calc()?"
Reply: Liam R E Quin: "Re: Can we have more maths in calc()?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:39 UTC