- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:58:50 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 10/29/2013 05:15 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: >>> Right now, the Flexbox ED has the following: >>> # 15. Determine the flex container’s used cross size: >>> # * If the cross size property is a definite size, use that. >>> # * Otherwise, use the sum of the flex lines' cross sizes. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure that last bullet-point needs to have something like this >>> appended: >>> ", clamped to the flex container's cross-axis min-size / max-size >>> properties" >>> >>> Without that change, I'm pretty sure this section is implicitly saying >>> to disregard "min-height" & "max-height" on auto-height horizontal flex >>> containers. (which seems undesirable) >> >> Are you assuming that the first bullet point is implicitly covered by >> the way that width/max-width/min-width are defined? Or should I make >> this correction apply to both clauses? > > Ah, good question. I guess that depends on whether the "definite size" > already incorporates min/max sizing constraints. > > Right now, it seems to me that the spec's definition for "definite size" > does *not* incorporate those constraints, -- it just talks about a > single quantity (a <length>, <percentage>, etc.)[1] > > So, I think you probably do want to make the correction apply to both > clauses. Cool, I've done so. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 18:59:36 UTC