W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-shapes] Positioning <basic-shapes> summary, v2

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:04:18 +0100
Message-ID: <1047561536.20131030180418@w3.org>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hello fantasai,

Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 5:58:01 PM, you wrote:

> On 10/29/2013 08:17 PM, Alan Stearns wrote:
>> I do agree that using <new-position> is also worthwhile. I just don't
>> think it needs to replace the simpler SVG syntax.

> SVG doesn't have an ordered set of arguments, it has an unordered
> one.

This is correct for attributes (where each of the four is a separate
attribute); they are unordered.

Its not the case for SVG bounding boxes, for example the viewBox
attribute where all four values are in one attribute and are in the
order x y w h.

Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:04:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:03 UTC