Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-282: Problems with Ethiopic-numeric algorithm

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Richard Ishida <> wrote:
> Raised by:
>     Richard Ishida
> Opened on:
>     2013-07-25
> Description:
>     7.2 Ethiopic Numeric Counter Style: ethiopic-numeric
>     - In the Nov 2002 version of the Lists module, step 5 did not have the
> text "that did not have its digits removed in the third step". Addition of
> that text causes the algorithm to fail to produce the simple example of 100.
> Removal of that text seems appropriate.

After I accept your correction of the third example, it looks like it
should actually say "that does not have the value zero".  Those groups
still don't generate group markers; it's just the ones with value 1
that still do, and that the spec was incorrectly cutting out.

This also reflects the instructions at

>     - In step 3, "then remove the digit" should really say "then remove the
> digits" (ie both digits). Otherwise it takes a while for the reader to be
> sure they understand the actual meaning.


>     - Step 6 says "except the group with number 0". Since all such groups
> had their digits removed in step 3, I think it should say rather: "except
> the groups where the digits were removed in step 3"

Sorry, that's referring to the index, not the value.  Changed to
"except the group with index 0".

>     - I was able to replicate the example 78010092 by following the
> algorithm, but not able to replicate the example 780000001092 - i think the
> ethiopic given for the latter example is actually for the decimal number
> 780100000092.

Yeah, you're right.  Fixed.


Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 01:25:17 UTC