- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:17:15 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/29/13 5:46 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >On 10/22/2013 12:46 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> >> >> On 10/21/13 11:15 PM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >>> >>> Secondly, I am dubious as it is about consistency with SVG being >>> of utility here, especially if it's not supported by use cases. >>> But choosing consistency with SVG over and instead of consistency >>> with CSS *in a CSS feature described with CSS syntax* seems a >>> little absurd. >> >> I don't think it's absurd at all, based your exact argument; because >> nobody uses CSS in isolation. They use CSS together with HTML, >>JavaScript, >> SVG...We should thus think of good design for the platform, not just for >> CSS. If SVG defines some basic primitive one way and CSS another then >> those authors who use both - a growing number in these high-DPI days - >> have to learn multiple syntaxes and ways to do things without a clear >> benefit. And it ain't a great way to spend tester and implementer time >> either. To the extent SVG already has a working model to define shapes I >> think your reasoning is exactly what makes it a natural starting point >>or, >> at least, a valid consideration. It doesn't mean we'll always be able to >> come up with something harmonious. It's also possible the result, while >> coherent and workable, is too unwieldy. But there is reasonable merit in >> *trying* to make the platform consistent when/if we can, not just CSS >> consistent with itself. I do not think we do authors any favor when we >> ignore the rest of the platform. > >My point is, CSS has a syntax for positioning rectangles within rectangles >*since Level 1*. Choosing consistency with SVG's way of positioning >rectangles *over and instead of* consistency with CSS's way of positioning >rectangles *in CSS* makes no sense whatsoever. I feel like I'm beating the proverbial dead horse here, but my proposal is not selecting SVG *instead of* CSS. I agree that we should support CSS conventions. I just want to do both. Thanks, Alan
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 01:17:49 UTC