W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Exposing Fundamental Primitives (was: [css-regions] Named Flows, Elements and Box Generation)

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:37:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CADC=+jfuj7=h7PqSoeT46KcGXvUMLvnkYytzPxec5Cu-KCFUNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, Hċkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:24 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>
>
> I disagree with the "is an underlying primitive" statement.  You can
> make it into one by rebuilding other things on top of it, but that
> doesn't mean it currently is one.
>
>
If primitive is a sticky term, would you agree though that it is a relevant
and potentially  useful/very reusable "layer"?



> > In general, it seems like things that use those two abilities will
> > become more common over time, rather than less.  We don't want to have
> > to be the gatekeepers that define every new bit of functionality
> > before authors can use it - that just means CSS continues to grow, and
> > do it slowly, forever.  We should be exposing this or something like
> > it, so authors can invent their own abilities and we can clean up
> > afterwards with simpler, more efficient sugar on top of it for common
> > things.
>
> Agreed, but I think the underlying primitives we expose to do that
> should actually be more like primitives -- they shouldn't involve
> things like implicit multi-pass layout (which isn't in the things
> you cite that are built on top of them).
>
> -David
>

So what would they be if we'd like to be able to specify some "things" for
layout purposes in CSSOM?  Anonoymous block that isn't part of a layout?
 Is that still high or now too low?

-- 
Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2013 19:37:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:03 UTC