- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:03:34 +0100
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2013 11:04:21 UTC
I'd suggest to make a survey again about what syntax is preferred. This seemed already very helpful for making a decision on the drag pseudo-classes. Sebastian On 29 October 2013 11:35, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment, the draft defines a single boolean flag on declarations for > !important. Issue 3 suggest generalizing that to arbitrary values. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-**syntax/#issue-5cca2746<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#issue-5cca2746> > > One possible use case that we discussed is adding type annotations to > Custom Properties for enabling interpolation: > > var-foo: red !type(color); > > However, as we don’t know yet which syntax we want… > > var-foo: red !important !type(color); > var-foo: red !important type(color); > var-foo: red !important, type: color; > > I suggest closing the issue for now and deferring this to a future level > of Syntax, when we have a CSS feature that uses this. > > -- > Simon Sapin > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2013 11:04:21 UTC