- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:46:24 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/16/13 11:30 AM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >Actually, an interesting related question is, how do you position an ><image>? We can shift circles around very powerfully if they're defined >inline, but there is no way to position a circle that's been derived >from an image. That's correct. We could extend this in future levels. Or we may find that getting the shape from a rendered background (with all of the positioning that allows) is sufficient. I don't think this is required for level 1, and I'd rather get some feedback from people using level 1 shape-from-image to determine what is required. > >While we're on it, how is that image sized? It's not defined. >From section 4.0: Sizing the shape from an image follows the Concrete Object Size Resolution section from [CSS3-IMAGES]. > >And to tie that back to the main thread... if we have the ability to >position an <image>, how does it interact if a <basic-shape> is given >instead? I'm not sure I follow what you're asking here. Are you thinking ahead to a shape-positioning property (or set of properties)? Thanks, Alan
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 19:46:53 UTC