- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 07:05:01 -0700
- To: "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>
- CC: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights@google.com> wrote: > "just readable, might be mutable" is self contradictory. I think you mean "readable, might be mutable". I suggest FooReader. This clearly states that it provides the ability to read a Foo, and does not state what other access it does or does not provide. > > "Only" should mean only. I am sorry, I didn't see that the discussion about the naming already continues on a different thread "Figuring out easier readonly interfaces". My fault. I suggest we continue discussion the name there. My apologies. Greetings, Dirk
Received on Monday, 14 October 2013 14:05:48 UTC