- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:42:00 -0700
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/4/13 12:25 PM, "François REMY" <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
>| Sigh. I did not ask for anything to be removed. I objected to any
>behavior
>| being made *optional*.
>
>Sorry if you took the last mail personally;
Nothing personal; it's just hard to make progress when people argue about
nearly everything except the point you're trying to make.
>I may have used the second
>person but I meant it as a general statement. Let's rephrase:
>
>| Sure. Then let's not remove @viewport{width/height} support from
>iframes
>| before implementors tell this group it's too hard to support.
The editor is welcome to propose removing it; it's up to the WG, where
implementors are well represented. We agreed a while ago it was up to them.
>|
>| We have in this very own thread an implementor thinking this part
>should
>be
>| easy to support, and an author thinking that this part is all that's
>really
>| needed for iframes, so let's agree to keep width/height support in,
>and
>just
>| add a note about the other properties not being supported in iframes.
See above.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 19:42:27 UTC