- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:19:01 -0700
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/4/13 11:02 AM, "François REMY" <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
>| "If.., if.., and if… If…" We should not write specs based on
>speculative
>| expectations of what implementors might do.
>
>Sure. Then do not remove @viewport{width/height} support from iframes
>before
>implementors tell you it's too hard to support.
Sigh. I did not ask for anything to be removed. I objected to any behavior
being made *optional*.
I also said *I* was OK with supporting sub-documents in the next level.
And I still am.
>
>We have in this very own thread an implementor thinking this part should
>be
>easy to support, and an author thinking that this part is all that's
>really
>needed for iframes, so let's agree to keep width/height support in, and
>just
>add a note about the other properties not being supported in iframes ;-)
See above.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 18:19:25 UTC