- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:40:08 -0700
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > > I think this is the best summation of the choice between the two options > we're considering. Do we want SVG-similarity for <basic-shape>, or > CSS-similarity? Speaking for all of us who never really learned to hand author SVG, I would definitely say I'd prefer CSS-similarity, to make it easier to learn and remember, and easier to understand when reading. >>> ex rounded corners in CSS are used (or abused) > to create non-rectangular shapes. In SVG, it makes sense to have only > basic rounded corners for rectangles, because you can use more appropriate > methods to create those non-rectangular shapes. Since I expect we'll > eventually add path() to the <basic-shape> roster, I'm not sure it's worth > the effort to synchronize rectangle() with what's possible with > border-radius. I can agree with that.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 04:40:37 UTC