Re: Agenda conf call 02-oct-2013

Regrets due to a meeting conflict.


On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Daniel Glazman <
daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:

> Time/Phone/SIP details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg. See
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Member/w3c-css-wg/2013JanMar/**0078.html<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2013JanMar/0078.html>
>
> ** CSS WG Members, please send regrets to Member-only list if you can't
> ** attend.
>
>
> 0. Scribe, extra agenda items and other digressions
> ------------------------------**---------------------
>
> I have received almost no agenda item requests and www-style
> does not contain lots of things worth confcall time. If you
> don't have extra items to discuss, it will be a short call.
>
> 1. GCPM and Page Floats
> -----------------------
>
> Everyone had an action item to review the two documents.
> Publish WDs? (please note we already resolved on GCPM during
> Paris ftf; we only decided an ED for PageFloats at that time)
>
> Please note Simon Sapin and Dave Cramer posted a few issues/comments
> on www-style. Are they blocking?
> Alan also made comments on Page Floats I do agree with. His proposed
> changes/extraction do make sense and would help reaching a cleaner WD
> for Page Floats.
>
> 2. DOMMatrix, DOMPoint and DOMPointLiteral
> ------------------------------**------------
>
> (cont'd from last week)
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Member/w3c-css-wg/2013JulSep/**0280.html<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2013JulSep/0280.html>
>
> 3. Shapes LC
> ------------
>
> publish ?
>
> </Daniel>
>
>
>