Re: [css-images] Intent to implement object-fit and object-position in Blink

Hi, and thank you for your answer. What I'd like to know now, though:
does Microsoft have anything against these properties, or is it
acceptable for you if they become enabled by default (and unprefixed) in
Blink?


Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> writes:

> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:21:26 +0200, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> wrote:
>>Any feedback? Apple? Microsoft? Mozilla?
>
> Microsoft is still evaluating this spec but haven't committed to its implementation.  Unfortunately, we don't have any dates we can share at this point.
>
> Israel
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm considering implementing object-fit [1] and object-position [2] in
>>> Blink, and would like to hear other vendors' opinions on supporting
>>> these properties, most importantly to figure out if anyone is negative,
>>> but also to learn about any plans to implement them. As far as I know,
>>> these properties are currently only supported in Presto, where it's -o-
>>> prefixed, and it's also using an older version (working draft or even
>>> editor's draft - not sure) of the spec. The spec has reached CR by now,
>>> though.
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-images-20120417/#the-object-fit
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/#the-object-position
>>>
>>> What I've found:
>>>
>>> Apple: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52040 (object-fit only),
>>> stuck in code review and Mac testing.
>>>
>>> Microsoft: No info.
>>>
>>> Mozilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624647 (object-fit
>>> only), no progress.
>>-- 
>>---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ----
>>---- Office: +47 23692400 ------ Mobile: +47 93440112 ----
>>------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
>

-- 
---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ----
------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------

Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 11:58:24 UTC