W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2013

Re: [selectors] :sorted pseudoclass for sorted tables

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:49:30 -0800
Message-ID: <5294285A.8050707@inkedblade.net>
To: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/25/2013 08:06 PM, Peter Linss wrote:
> It’s also unfortunate that the selector uses ‘ascending’ and
> ‘descending’ where HTML uses ‘’ and ‘reversed’ for the sort order.
> It would be easier for authors to remember if they were in sync.

We could use 'normal' and 'reverse'

(Should HTML be using 'reverse' instead of 'reversed'?)

Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 04:49:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:37 UTC