Re: [selectors] :sorted pseudoclass for sorted tables

On 11/25/2013 08:06 PM, Peter Linss wrote:
>
> It’s also unfortunate that the selector uses ‘ascending’ and
> ‘descending’ where HTML uses ‘’ and ‘reversed’ for the sort order.
> It would be easier for authors to remember if they were in sync.

We could use 'normal' and 'reverse'
   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-animations/#animation-direction

(Should HTML be using 'reverse' instead of 'reversed'?)

~fantasai