- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:23:17 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > On 22/11/2013 20:56, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Yeah, double-escaping isn't great. I'm fine with defining a smaller >> ad-hoc syntax. Let's say: >> >> Four tokens: >> >> 1. Run of digits, ASCII letters, or non-ASCII characters. >> 2. Single ASCII periods. >> 3. Run of whitespace. >> 4. Anything else. >> >> Presence of #4 invalidates the property. Throw away #3. #1 and #2 >> constitute the cell names. >> >> This allows you to produce areas with awkward names to write as >> idents, but it's nice and simple. > > Sounds good, though I would add dash and underscore (U+002D and U+005F) to > 1, making it match "name code point": Oh, right, yes. My intention was indeed to match name code point. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 21:24:04 UTC