W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2013

Re: [css-fonts] Chinese font Kai count as cursive

From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:23:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CADJvFOU_mrenzdOhw0xJKpVLw2o7iRbkS+dOsDvj3ChSeKSG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: 董福興 Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
2013/11/14 fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>:
> Proposed edits:
>   1. In definition of 'serif' replace 'Kai' with 'Ming'.
>   2. In definition of 'serif' replace 'formal text' with 'traditional print'.

This is definitely more accurate.

>   3. In definition of 'cursive' replace 'informal' with 'flowing'.

This should definitely be done. Cursive can be very formal, but it is
also by definition flowing, so flowing is much better (much more
accurate and correct) than informal.

>   4. Add these examples to definition of 'cursive', same as for
>      'serif' and 'sans-serif': Kaisho (Japanese), Kai (Chinese).

That would be great.

-ambrose <http://gniw.ca>
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 07:24:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:37 UTC