- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:34:46 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > Le 05/11/2013 17:48, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> Yeah, the spec hasn't been updated yet, but we agreed that >> pseudo-elements *can* be followed by arbitrary other selectors. This >> is only relevant for pseudo-elements that can contain content, like >> ::region or ::content (from Shadow DOM). > > That’s case-by-case for pseudo-element where it’s relevant, right? > `div::after p` will still be invalid? Depends on what you mean by "invalid". We could either drop it, based on grammar mismatch, or just have it be allowed, but guaranteed to match nothing. The only observable difference is that the rules will be preserved in the CSSOM in the latter case but not the former. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 18:35:34 UTC