- From: Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:53:46 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 18:54:15 UTC
I don't think we need to move away from the property/value pair syntax that
is already in use:
@media (name: huge) or (name: medium) { ... }
-Chris
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What about just:
> >
> >> <html>
> >> <script>
> >> if (window.outerWidth >= 600)
> >> document.css.media.huge = true;
> >> }
> >> </script>
> >> <style>
> >> @media ("huge") {
> >
> >> .facet_sidebar {
> >> display: none;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> </style>
> >> </html>
>
> Hmm, using bare strings as the media query name is interesting. It's
> definitely unambiguous and non-colliding, and means that authors can
> give whatever they want as the name without having to worry about
> escaping. Plus, nice and short. +1.
>
> ~TJ
>
>
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 18:54:15 UTC