- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 12:10:49 -0600
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+eQtCLvrcgHDdHQ2=T1qk9g_zOP3SP88__WH1GezC++4g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > >> > In [1], the phrases "start edge" and "end edge" are used without > >> > qualifying > >> > which axis applies. > >> > >> That's because this is the generic list of terms which are shared by > >> several alignment properties. The axis in which they apply is > >> determined by the property. > >> > >> (If this is a problem, then several other terms like "center" are > >> similarly ambiguous.) > > > > In the present case, they are used in a technical sense, so there should > be > > a definition or a reference to one. > > I don't understand this response. It doesn't seem directly connected > to what you're responding to. > > >> > Also, I notice the terms "start side" and "end side" also appear under > >> > the > >> > definitions of self-start and self-end. The term "side" is not defined > >> > in > >> > this spec nor is a definition referenced. For that matter, the term > >> > "edge" > >> > is similarly undefined. At the minimum, "edge" and "side" need to be > >> > carefully distinguished, with example illustrations if possible. > >> > > >> > [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-align/#ltcontent-position > >> > >> They're both English words, not special technical terms. I don't > >> think further definition is necessary, unless you can explain how you > >> find them confusing. > > > > Since in this case, I have no idea the difference between "edge" and > "side", > > then it is definitely a problem. > > I don't see how it's confusing. More importantly, I'm not sure how I > could rephrase it without using the same or nearly identical words. > Let's discuss this at the F2F, we seem to be talking past each other (as usual).
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 18:11:37 UTC