- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 12:02:49 +0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 29/05/2013 11:45, John Daggett a écrit : > This requires that the individual value definition blocks be a > subclass of CSSRule. So then you need to define what it contains. And > you really start to bend the notion of what an @-rule is, the value > definition blocks look like @-rules but basically aren't other than > from a syntax viewpoint. What does it mean if*other* CSSGroupingRule > structs contain one of these CSSRule's?!? Defining individual CSSRule’s for the components of CSSFontFeatureValuesRule might be annoying and not useful, but that last point is not a problem. We already have many at-rules that are only allowed in some contexts (@import before any style rule, page-margin rules only inside @page, …) If an author does it wrong, the rule is invalid and ignored. Same as if it had invalid syntax. Cheers, -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 04:03:19 UTC