- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:33:14 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:53 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-animations/ is currently not clear on > what CSS animations should do in non-interactive media. (The > "Media" lines in the spec are almost certainly wrong.) > > For example, when printing, what happens to CSS animations? There > are two obvious choices: > > (1) ignore the animation properties and don't apply any animations > > (2) honor the animation properties and freeze the animations at > time 0 > > I tend to think the correct answer is (1); this allows authors to > get reasonable fallback when the initial state of their animation is > offscreen or similarly useless, and it matches the fallback they > already (should) have for implementations that don't support CSS > animations. > > (It's not what Gecko currently implements, but I'm thinking of > changing it.) This sounds correct to me. Non-interactive media simply can't *implement* animations, so they should be handled like anything else that isn't implemented, and summarily ignored. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 15:34:09 UTC