W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [css-compositing] new Editor's draft posted -> update

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 00:45:49 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaDKxkcLckma0Mx_WYCDda+QbDRRGfHaKFmzdt5fSZehg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Mullany <michael@sencha.com>, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think there is now a clear path on how to calculate the backdrop for
> HTML but how to calculate it for SVG is still in question.


I don't really understand this. The issues in SVG are a strict subset of
the issues in HTML. We should make SVG follow HTML and dispense with
"enable-background".

Filters, blending and opacity should probably cause isolation...


The spec says stacking contexts cause isolation, so these already do.

Rob
-- 
q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq
qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq
qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq
qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q
qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq
qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
Received on Friday, 24 May 2013 16:46:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:30 UTC