Re: [css3-fonts] Minor Comments Part II from fantasai on 2013-05-24 (www-style@w3.org from May 2013)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 12:26:38 +0800
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <519EEBFE.4000209@inkedblade.net>

On 05/24/2013 12:58 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 00:44:50 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>
>>    # avoid creating font-size resulting in less than 9 pixels
>>
>> s/pixels/device pixels/ because we have too many pixels in CSS...
>
> This doesn't sound like the kind of pixels that are wanted here. At really high densities, even though 9 device pixels might
> be sufficient to represent the shapes of each glyph (Latin ones, at least), the resulting physical sizes would be too small to
> actually preserve readability.

Fair enough. In which case, s/9 pixels/9px/ :)

~fantasai

Received on Friday, 24 May 2013 04:27:11 UTC