- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 23:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Spec revised to use the same processing rules for both unquoted font family names and unquoted names used in the argument to local() functions within @font-face rules. John Daggett ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Daggett" <jdaggett@mozilla.com> To: www-style@w3.org Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 6:29:49 PM Subject: [css3-fonts] unquoted names in local() (was: Re: [css3-fonts] Minor Comments IV) fantasai wrote: > Also, question: is it treated as a string between the parens (very > unusual for CSS) or is it treated as a real functional notation > (whitespace is trimmed)? I think it should be the latter, and that > the argument should be parsed and handled exactly like a family name > in font-family (minus the reserved keyword concerns). I think that > would be less confusing. In which case, the wording describing the > syntax here should appropriately mirror that of font-family.) I agree, the name argument of the local() function should follow the rules used for font-family rules, either a string or an unquoted sequence of ident's with whitespace collapsed. Regards, John Daggett
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 06:36:19 UTC