Hi, I noticed a contradiction in the flexbox spec about items that have display: table-row. Notably here: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox/#flex-items "A flex item establishes a new formatting context for its contents. The type of this formatting context is determined by its ‘display’ value, as usual. The computed ‘display’ of a flex item is determined by applying the table in CSS 2.1 Chapter 9.7." That table requires adjusting table-row/table-cell/etc to block. But later, the flexbox spec says: "Some values of ‘display’ trigger the generation of anonymous boxes. For example, a misparented ‘table-cell’ child is fixed up by generating anonymous ‘table’ and ‘table-row’ elements around it. [CSS21] This fixup must occur before a flex container's children are promoted to flex items." That inconsistency should be fixed... browsers are disagreeing on this behavior (Firefox does the anon wrapper, Chrome does the promote-to-block thing). I found this while running the Gecko tests in Chrome. -christianReceived on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 01:46:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:28 UTC