W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [css-syntax] Ready for wide review, FPWD request coming soon

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 23:35:00 +0800
Message-ID: <519A42A4.2040803@exyr.org>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 19/05/2013 09:27, Zack Weinberg a écrit :
>>> * 4. Unicode-range tokens may need a "valid" flag.  I need to
>>>    cross-check the code in Gecko against the algorithm in this spec
>>>    carefully, but the definition of UNICODE-RANGE in CSS2.1 included
>>>    several forms that were semantically invalid.
>> The parser in Syntax ended up only accepting valid unicode ranges
>> (except that it does, technically, allow for ranges where the min is
>> higher than the max).  This is more restrictive than CSS 2.1, but it
>> only fails to cover things that were invalid in the first place.
> I will pay careful attention to this section when I go back through.

Note that in addition to invalid ranges that make the declaration 
dropped, what css-syntax calls an "empty range" is either "invalid and 
ommited" or just "ommited". I’ll write in another thread so that 
css-fonts doesn’t here "invalid" in this case.

Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 15:35:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:28 UTC