- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:03:04 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/24/2013 09:58 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#tab-size defines a 'tab-size' > property taking an integer to be multiplied by the advance width of > the space (U+0020) character. > > However, http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/#font-relative-lengths > defines the 'ch' unit as using the advance width of the '0' (U+0030) > character, which I believe was the result of implementation > experience that '0' produced good results for sizing in proportional > fonts, and made no difference in monospace fonts. (I think that > implementation experience related specifically to sizing of text > inputs.) > > Should 'tab-size' instead use the '0' width rather than the ' ' > width? I think I would prefer such a change. Given that current behavior in pretty much every tool I've ever used is to define tabs as exact multiples of the space character, regardless of whether a monospace or proportional font is used, I think this would be a bad change to make. Let me know if you disagree. :) ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 11 May 2013 02:03:31 UTC