W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [css-color] Have you considered standardizing a rgba(#RRGGBB, <alpha-value>) notation?

From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 21:52:58 +0300
Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>, "Sam L'ecuyer" <sam@cateches.is>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Šime Vidas <sime.vidas@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3C9B9BF4-A79E-446A-B923-DE60DF562D68@w3.org>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
There is discussion in the FXTF (and I think it's made it into the ED as well) to apply filters only to specific areas of an element such as borders, shadows or backgrounds.

Lea Verou
W3C developer relations
http://w3.org/people/all#leahttp://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou






On May 10, 2013, at 21:44, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote:
>> On May 10, 2013, at 21:11, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>> I can see the potential for a property that adjusts the computed-value
>>> of other color properties in this way.  Call it 'color-adjust', have
>>> its value be a number of property names and color-adjusters like what
>>> color() has, in a comma-separated list.
>> 
>> What use case does this cover that CSS Filters do not?
> 
> It seems completely unrelated.  If you just want to adjust the
> border-color of a box on hover, for example darkening it to indicate
> that it's "ready to be clicked", you can't do that with CSS filters.
> 
> ~TJ
> 
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 18:53:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:29 UTC