- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 00:37:37 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Monday 2013-05-06 18:32 -0700, fantasai wrote: > On 03/24/2013 09:13 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-underline-position-property > >says: > > # ‘left’ > > # In vertical writing modes, the underline is aligned as for > > # ‘under’, except it is always aligned to the left edge of the > > # text. If this causes the underline to be drawn on the "over" > > # side of the text, then an overline also switches sides and is > > # drawn on the "under" side. > > # > > # ‘right’ > > # In vertical writing modes, the underline is aligned as for > > # ‘under’, except it is always aligned to the right edge of the > > # text. If this causes the underline to be drawn on the "over" > > # side of the text, then an overline also switches sides and is > > # drawn on the "under" side. > > > >This should specify what happens in horizontal writing modes. My > >guess is that the intent was to behave exactly as 'under', but the > >specification should say so. > > It already says so: > > # If ‘under’ is specified alone, ‘left’ is also implied. If ‘left’ > # or ‘right’ is specified alone, ‘under’ is also implied. > > That should be sufficient, right? Yes. (Though it's still a little confusing until you get all the way to the end of the list. Maybe that text could be earlier?) -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 07:38:04 UTC