- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:02:09 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Monday 2013-05-06 18:16 -0700, fantasai wrote: > On 03/24/2013 07:01 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#line-decoration describes > >the model for text-decoration drawing, largely analogous to the > >model described in the text chapter of CSS 2.1: > >http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/text.html#decoration > >CSS 2.1's model for text-decorations also includes its rules on > >z-ordering of text-decorations in > >http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/zindex.html > > > >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-decoration-skip adds > >a new text-decoration-skip property. When this property's computed > >value does not contain 'objects', text decorations are drawn on > >atomic inlines. > > > > > >The z-ordering of the text-decorations drawn on atomic inlines also > >needs to be specified in such a way that a reader could determine > >exactly where in Appendix E of CSS 2.1 it fits. It is currently > >unspecified, as far as I can tell. > > Good point. Added a new chapter on that: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor/#painting-order > > # As in [CSS21], text decorations are drawn immediately over/under > # the text they decorate, in the following order (bottommost first): > # > # 1. shadows (‘text-shadow’) > # 2. underlines (‘text-decoration’) > # 3. overlines (‘text-decoration’) > # 4. text > # 5. emphasis marks (‘text-emphasis’) > # 6. line-through (‘text-decoration’) > # > # Where line decorations are drawn across box decorations or > # atomic inlines, they are drawn over non-positioned content > # and just below any positioned descendants (immediately > # below layer #8 in CSS2.1 Appendix E). > > Let us know if that seems correct/sufficient! This doesn't seem quite sufficient since shadows are composed of: * underlines * overlines * text * emphasis marks (I assume, but it should be specified!) * line-through as specified in http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#text-shadow-property (except for the lack of mention of emphasis marks). I think the obvious adjustment to place all of these items inside the shadows item in the same order they are for normal drawing would be sufficient to fix this. > >The model > >(http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/#line-decoration) says: > > # The ‘visibility’ property, ‘text-shadow’, filters, and other > > # graphical transformations likewise affect text decorations as > > # part of the text they're drawn on, even if the decorations were > > # specified on an ancestor box. > > > >This also needs to specify how these effects work with atomic > >inlines. For example, I would expect 'visibility' on an atomic > >inline that is decorated because of text-decoration-skip to change > >the visibility of the decoration, but I would not expect > >'visibility' on its descendants to do so. Likewise, I would expect > >the rules for application of filters to be consistent with the rules > >for z-ordering. > > Added > # (In the case of line decorations drawn over an atomic inline > # or across box decorations, they are similarly associated with > # the affected box rather than the decorating box.) > to that paragraph. Let me know if that's sufficiently clear... Does "box decorations" mean "margin, border, and padding"? I think it should be clearer to say so, and perhaps also say that that wording applies specifically to the margin, border, and padding only of non-replaced inline boxes. I think it might also help to say "the affected atomic inline box or non-replaced inline box". -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 06:02:34 UTC