Re: Transformed Pointer Coordinates?

Yes, the 'Pref' entry is mozilla specific and is how we enable experimental
features without prefixes.

--Jet

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:

> That looks good.
> I assume the 'Pref' entry is just mozilla specific and won't be part of
> the spec.
>
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Jet Villegas W3C <w3c@junglecode.net>wrote:
>
>> I've started hacking this up for Gecko[1]. The DOMPoint IDL source
>> currently looks like this:
>>
>> [Constructor(optional float x = 0, optional float y = 0),Pref="layout.css.dompoint.enabled"]
>> dictionary DOMPoint {
>>   float x = 0;
>>   float y = 0;
>> };
>>
>> I'd like to ratify the IDL in the appropriate spec before moving on to
>> the coord-space-conversion methods. Do we have consensus?
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850805
>>
>> --Jet
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, folks-
>>>
>>> When elements are transformed (shifted X/y through translate, larger or
>>> smaller through scale, etc.) using CSS transforms or SVG, dealing with
>>> pointer events becomes more complicated and unintuitive... things just
>>> aren't where they appear to be.
>>>
>>> This leads to all sorts of confusion for authors in positioning
>>> things... dragging, repositioning, or creating elements based on pointer
>>> position. (To a lesser extent, this is a general problem with positioning
>>> relative to transformed elements, but nesting context takes care of most
>>> non-pointer-position cases.)
>>>
>>> Jonathan Watt (Mozilla) has a handy script library [1] that helps
>>> authors solve this in SVG, but unless someone knows about that script, it
>>> is frustrating. I think this should be solved in a spec, perhaps as a
>>> method to get the relative transformed coordinates in the appropriate
>>> coordinate space.
>>>
>>> I started to address this in DOM3 Events [2][3], but we decided to defer
>>> it, or to address it in CSSOM or the CSS Transforms spec.
>>>
>>> I'm raising this here to ask where it is most appropriate to address
>>> this: the Pointer Events v2 spec (still in the future), the CSS Transforms
>>> spec, or the CSSOM spec?
>>>
>>> [1] http://jwatt.org/svg/tmp/**mouse-relative-positioning.svg<http://jwatt.org/svg/tmp/mouse-relative-positioning.svg>
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/09/16-**webapps-minutes.html#item09<http://www.w3.org/2009/09/16-webapps-minutes.html#item09>
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/10/13-**webapps-minutes.html#item01<http://www.w3.org/2010/10/13-webapps-minutes.html#item01>
>>>
>>> Regards-
>>> -Doug
>>>
>>>
>>
>